Friday, November 18, 2011

Majjom’s Livelihood

He was pulling the rikshwa with all his effort. He drove me from Ranja Airport to Tribhuvan Chowk, Nepalgunj and asked for one hundred and fifty rupees. 17 years old, Majjom was hesitant to share his story with me. I insisted.

He told me he has been driving rikshwa since last three years (which meant that he started to drive rikshwa from his fourteen!) I was stunned. I asked him why did he leave the school. He proved my question absolutely wrong. He said he does this means of livlihood in his off time only. Majjom goes to school in the day time and drives in morning, evening and only in off days. I gave him Rs 180 in total with Rs 30 as incentive for his zeal to make a better life. That was the only thing I could do!

I could smile with a thought that this generation is going to do ‘something’ to make a better Nepal. I am owed for Majjom’s  spirit to live and make things beautiful. The history of human civilization has been decorated by the economic activities of people.

Labor Market Can Advance ‘The Hope’

The rays of hope in the labor market of Nepal have appeared. The labor unions have agreed to formulate a new Labor Act which will help to normalize the situation of industrial sector in Nepal.

The draft of new Labor Act, the government prepared with the help of International Labor Organization (ILO) has been taken as a hope to normalize the labor issues in the industrial sector of Nepal.

Wednesday, November 9, 2011

One More time, lets talk about Vishakhapatnam Port

Nepal is one more time going to table the issue of Visakhapatnam port in the Inter-Governmental Committee (IGC) meeting with India . This issue has been discussed with India since more than a decade with India. The Indian Premier Dr. Manmohan Singh had agreed with his Nepali counterpart Dr. Baburam Bhattrai in latter's India visit last month. The IGC meeting is held in every six months between two countries' joint secretary level. This IGC meeting is going to be a small platform to see how much Indian side is positive to upgrade the Nepal's international and regional trade.
 

Sunday, November 6, 2011

Weak Economic Diplomacy is a Constant Problem for Nepal's Regional and International Trade


Since more than a decade Nepal is constantly requesting with India to get facility of using the Visakhapatnam port for a better trade with the third countries. Almost in each of the bilateral meeting, Nepali side keeps the issue on table. India never says, 'No'. But till the date, India is not ready to materialize its words into action. One more time India has agreed to give the facility of using Visakhapatnam port during the premier Dr. Baburam Bhattari's visit in last month--October. Nepal is suffering from different problems, like congestion, in Kolkata and Haldiya ports.
In few many informal discussions, officials from Ministry of Commerce and Supply admit that Nepal is lacking the diplomatic effort to push India. This is just a reflection of Nepal-India trade issues. Keep in mind that, we have more than 50 years old Treaty of Trade and Transit with India.
Our Northern neighbor, China is constantly working on its part to upgrade the infrastructures in the border for more volume of trade between Nepal and China. In April 2010, China gave the zero-tariff treatment to the 3 hundred 61 products, which is almost 95 percent of Nepal's total products, to reduce the trade imbalance between two countries.
But where do we have the supply list, what China is expecting to import from Nepal? What China wants to export in Nepal, does china consider Nepal as a potential market for its quality products? Chinese Ambassador to Nepal Qui Guohong is emphasizing on establishing the Trade Areas and Special Economic Zones to vitalize the trade between two countries.
These two cases with our two neighboring countries show that both of them have their own economic diplomacy. What we lack here in Nepal is the sound economic diplomacy. We don't have a balanced approach to our neighbors when it comes to the economic diplomacy. There are enough cases of our unwillingness to maintain the balance. The Chinese pro-activeness in bilateral trade increment and India's cosmetic flavor in the political levels implicitly signify that Nepal do not have its own standard in the diplomatic level to enhance the trade.
The supply-side constraints of our country are understandable but what we are not acknowledging is the 'comfort-zone' of our diplomats towards widening the trade partners. This is the time to get one clear answer why Nepal is not being able to have a direct discussion with Bangladesh about the transit and at the same time why China gives grant to the military force of Nepal but any support to enhance the situation of industrial sector? These questions deserve the answers and answer is 'lack of economic diplomacy of country'.
Nepal has specifically three Commercial Ambassadors in India, Hongkong and Tibet. What our Commercial Ambassadors are doing over there and what is the reason behind government's initiation few months back to send the commercial ambassadors to Spain and Portugal? United States of America could have been one option to send the commercial ambassador or to any another country with which we have a significant volume of bilateral trade. The Trade and Investment Framework Agreement (TIFA) between Nepal and America, which happened this year, is one of the examples of Nepali side's recklessness while signing any agreement either it’s a bilateral one or a multilateral one. The TIFA is just a formality. Honorable ambassador to USA Dr. Shankar Sharma himself is a scholar of economic discipline but what happened while signing the agreement was embarrassing to any citizen of Nepal. Nepal has got not a single privilege from TIFA that other LDCs have not got already from USA.
Nepal entered into the World Trade Organization (WTO) membership in 2004. This forum is one of the most vibrant multilateral platforms for any country in the world. WTO negotiations are always stressful for country like Nepal which has the huge amount of trade with one country--India--with whom the WTO norms do not apply. Nepal's clear failure in economic diplomacy is not being able to revise the Treaty of Trade and Transit, 1960 with India.
Here arises a prominent question that why everything seems functioning and sound in the political level between Nepal and India but in diplomatic levels? This implies our failure on economic diplomacy. India's sound, favorable and supportive face is not the real, if it was it would have been ready to let Nepal and Bangladesh have a bilateral talk for their betterment. But it doesn't in practical term. Again it goes to the same bottle that we have very weak position in every way.
China's proactive approach to strengthen the bilateral trade is also within the circle of doubt. There are rooms which prove again that China's intention is not clear. It has given the zero-tariff treatment to Nepali products and at the same time helping to develop the dry port in Tatopani but this is just a rosy gift to Nepal. China has given the zero-tariff treatment for 4 thousand 7 hundred 21 products from different Least Developed Countries (LDCs). What China is doing with Nepal might be something but do we have any guts say no for that we don't need and tell them what our priorities are. We have the Currently, Nepal and China has Rs 36 billion trade and Nepal suffers Rs 32 billion trade imbalance.



Nepal needs to take decisive actions : IMF

In the IMF's latest notice http://www.imf.org/external/np/sec/pn/2011/pn11134.htm, it has strongly suggested Nepal to make a 'structural reform'. 'Nepal's central bank leadership is being more and more immature and taking very short term measures in the financial sector', blames Dipendra Bahadur Kshetry, the vice president of National Planning Commission http://www.npc.gov.np/.

By showing the inefficiency of Nepal's Central Bank, IMF has said that for the productivity and potential growth there should be the structural reform as soon as possible. Another point that the Nepal side should be aware is that IMF has asked it to take the 'decisive action' to balance the fragile situation of economic situation.  

Thursday, February 17, 2011

खाद्यान्न अभाव कायमै

भोजराज पौडेल,काठमाडौं

विश्व खाद्य कार्यक्रम (डब्लूएफपी) ले यस वर्ष पनि नेपालमा खाद्यान्न अभाव कायम रहने जनाएको छ । प्रकाशन तयारीमा रहेको डब्लूएफपी प्रतिवेदनले नेपालमा सन् २००९ देखि ह्वात्तै बढेर गएको खाद्यान्न अभाव २०११ मा पनि कायम रहने देखाएको हो । सन् २००९ को तुलनामा २०१० मा खाद्यान्न अभाव १ सय ३९ प्रतिशतले बढेको थियो ।
“यस वर्ष अघिल्लो वर्षजति अभाव नहुने भए पनि सुधारका संकेत देखिएका छैनन्,” प्रतिवेदनमा भनिएको छ । यद्यपि उसले अभावको मात्रा भने बाहिर ल्याएको छैन ।
डब्लूएफपीको तथ्यांकअनुसार सन् २००९ मा १ लाख ३२ हजार मेट्रिक टन खाद्यान्न अभाव रहेकोमा सन् २०१० मा बढेर ३ लाख १६ हजार मेट्रिक टन पुगेको थियो ।
समयमा पानी परेका कारण केही निश्चित भूभागलाई छाडेर अन्य क्षेत्रमा उत्पादकत्व बढे पनि उत्पादनमा खासै सुधार नआउने डब्लूएफपीले जनाएको छ । गत वर्ष नेपालका झन्डै ४३ जिल्लामा खाद्यान्न अभाव थियो ।
सुदूरपश्चिममा देखिएको संकटको समस्या विस्तारै उर्वर मानिएको तराई भेगतर्फ पनि सरेको प्रतिवेदनले देखाएको छ । तराईका सप्तरी र धनुषा जिल्लामा २००९ को तुलनामा क्रमशः २८ र २० प्रतिशतले वर्षे बाली उत्पादन घटेको छ ।
प्रतिवेदनअनुसार सप्तरीमा २००९ मा १ लाख ६७ हजार मेट्रिक टन धान उत्पादन भएको थियो भने २०१० मा घटेर जम्मा १ लाख २० हजार ६ सय ११ मेट्रिक टन पुगेको थियो । त्यस्तै, धनुषामा २००९ मा १ लाख ५० हजार ४ सय ७७ मेट्रिक टन धान उत्पादन भएकोमा २०१० मा घटेर १ लाख २३ हजार ३ सय ५२ मेट्रिक टन उत्पादन भएको छ । समयमा वर्षा नहुँदा र व्यवस्थित सिँचाइ सुविधाको अभावमा धान उत्पादन घटेको डब्लूएफपीले जनाएको छ ।
समाचार एजेन्सी इन्टिग्रेटेड रिजनल इन्फर्मेसन नेटवक्र्स (आईआरआईएन अर्थात् इरिन) ले नेपालमा सिँचाइको अवस्था नाजुक भएकाले बाली उत्पादनमा ह्रास आएको समाचार सम्प्रेषण गरेको छ । विज्ञहरूको हवाला दिँदै उसले नेपालमा खाद्यान्न अभाव पूर्ति गर्न व्यवस्थित सिँचाइ अत्यावश्यक रहेको बताएको छ । यसका लागि सरकारले पहलकदमी गर्नुपर्ने इरिनले उल्लेख गरेको छ ।
सन् १९७० सम्म नेपाल खाद्यान्न निर्यात गर्ने मुलुकमा पथ्र्यो । त्यसयताका दशकमा नेपालले निरन्तर खाद्यान्न आयात गर्दै आएको छ । खाद्य असुरक्षाको जोखिम तथा आपतकालीन खाद्यान्न सुविधा उपलब्ध गराउने डब्लूएफपीले सन् १९६३ देखि नेपालमा काम गर्दै आएको छ ।
कृषि तथा सहकारी मन्त्रालयका अनुसार नेपालमा प्रतिहेक्टर २.५ टन बाली उत्पादन हुन्छ । सन् १९७० सम्म कुल जनसंख्याको दुईतिहाइ हिमाली तथा पहाडी भेगमा बसोबास गर्थे भने बाँकी एकतिहाई तराई क्षेत्रमा थिए । पहाडी तथा हिमाली भेगमा निरन्तर खाद्यान्न अभाव चुलिँदै गएपछि मानिसहरू क्रमशः तराई क्षेत्रमा बसाइसराइ गर्न बाध्य भएका छन् । उच्च जनसंख्या वृद्धिदर र असमान जनसंख्या वितरणका कारण तराई क्षेत्रमा समेत खाद्यान्न अभाव देखिएको छ ।

Wednesday, February 2, 2011

Asia's Inflation Trap

Asia has an inflation problem. The sooner it comes to grips with its problem, the better. Unfortunately, the appropriate sense of urgency is missing.
Willingness to tackle inflation is impeded by Asia’s heavy reliance on exports and external demand. Fearful of a relapse of end-market demand in a still-shaky post-crisis world, Asian policymakers have been reluctant to take an aggressive stand for price stability. That needs to change – before it’s too late.
Excluding Japan, which remains mired in seemingly chronic deflation, Asian inflation rose to 5.3% in the 12 months ending in November 2010, up markedly from the 3.5% rate a year earlier. Trends in the region’s two giants are especially worrisome, with inflation having pierced the 5% threshold in China and running in excess of 8% in India. Price growth is worrisome in Indonesia (7%), Singapore (3.8%), Korea (3.5%), and Thailand (3%) as well.
Yes, sharply rising food prices are an important factor in boosting headline inflation in Asia. But this is hardly a trivial development for low-income families in the developing world, where the share of foodstuffs in household budgets – 46% in India and 33% in China – is 2-3 times the ratio in developed countries.
At the same time, there has been a notable deterioration in underlying “core” inflation, which strips out food and energy prices. Annual core inflation for Asia (excluding Japan) was running at a 4% rate in late 2010 – up about one percentage point from late 2009.
A key lesson from the Great Inflation of the 1970’s is that central banks can’t afford a false sense of comfort from any dichotomy between headline and core inflation. Spillover effects are inevitable, and once a corrosive increase in inflationary expectations sets in, it becomes all the more painful to unwind. The good news for Asia is that most of the region’s monetary authorities are, in fact, tightening policy. The bad news is that they have been generally slow to act.
Financial markets appear to be expecting a good deal more Asian monetary tightening – at least that’s the message that can be drawn from sharply appreciating Asian currencies, which seem to be responding to prospective moves in policy interest rates. Relative to the US dollar, an equal-weighted basket of 10 major Asian currencies (excluding Japan) has retraced the crisis-related distortions of 2008-2009 and has now returned to pre-crisis highs.
Export-led economies, of course, can’t take currency appreciation lightly – it undermines competitiveness and risks eroding the country’s share of the global market. It also invites destabilizing hot-money capital inflows. Given the tenuous post-crisis climate, with uncertain demand prospects in the major markets of the developed world, Asia finds itself in a classic policy trap, dragging its feet on monetary tightening while risking the negative impact of stronger currencies.
There is only one way out for Asia: a significant increase in real, or inflation-adjusted, policy interest rates. Benchmark policy rates are currently below headline inflation in India, South Korea, Hong Kong, Singapore, Thailand, and Indonesia. They are only slightly positive in China, Taiwan, and Malaysia.
The lessons of earlier battles against inflation are clear on one fundamental point: inflationary pressures cannot be contained by negative, or slightly positive, real short-term interest rates. The only effective anti-inflation strategy entails aggressive monetary tightening that takes policy rates into the restrictive zone. The longer this is deferred, the more wrenching the ultimate policy adjustment – and its consequences for growth and employment – will be. With inflation – both headline and core – now on an accelerating path, Asian central banks can’t afford to slip further behind the curve.
Asia has far too many important items on its strategic agenda to remain caught in a policy trap. This is especially true of China, whose government is focused on the pro-consumption rebalancing imperatives of its soon-to-be-enacted 12th Five-Year Plan.
So far, the Chinese leadership has adopted a measured approach to inflation. Its efforts focus mainly on increasing banks’ mandatory reserve ratios while introducing administrative measures to deal with food price pressures, approving a couple of token interest-rate hikes, and managing a modest upward adjustment in the currency.
The mix of Chinese policy tightening, however, needs to shift much more decisively toward higher interest rates. With the Chinese economy still growing at close to 10% per year, the government can afford to take more short-term policy risk in order to clear the way for its structural agenda.
Indeed, China’s dilemma is emblematic of one of developing Asia’s greatest challenges: the need to tilt the growth model away from external toward internal demand. That can’t happen without increased wages and purchasing power for workers. But, in an increasingly inflationary environment, any such efforts could fuel an outbreak of the dreaded wage-price spiral – the same lethal interplay that wreaked such havoc in the United States in the 1970’s. Asia can avoid this problem and get on with the heavy lifting of pro-consumption rebalancing only by nipping inflation in the bud.
Much is made of Asia’s Teflon-like resilience in an otherwise tough post-crisis climate. Led by China, the high-flying economies of developing Asia are increasingly viewed as the new and powerful engines of a multi-speed world. While the jury is out on whether there has really been such a seamless transition of global economic leadership, Asia must face up to the critical challenges that may come with this new role. Inflation, if not addressed now, could seriously compromise the region’s ability to meet those challenges.

Stephen S. Roach, a member of the faculty of Yale University, is Non-Executive Chairman of Morgan Stanley Asia and author of The Next Asia.
Copyright: Project Syndicate, 2011.
www.project-syndicate.org