This article was first published in The Kathmandu Post, Jan 12, 2018.
Following
the completion of local, provincial and federal elections, there are now 761
governments in the country with full authority to govern as per the
constitution. In a way, we now have 761 labs that will be testing different
policies and governance practices. Each rural municipality, municipality and
provincial government has the authority to ensure rule of law, develop quality public
infrastructure, design the syllabus up to the secondary level, maintain
sanitary facilities, improve service delivery and upgrade the quality of life
of local citizens. Each government is free to develop systems that facilitate
the process of paying local taxes and guarantee optimal utilisation of local
resources.
The
Local Government Operation Act, 2017 allows local governments to develop and
implement short-, medium- and long-term plans. This means we will be
experimenting with different kinds of governance mechanisms, organic ways of
ensuring rule of law and different modalities of tax collection. The bright
side is that we might see new and innovative ways of ensuring good governance.
The traditional modality of adopting one homogenous way of governance will come
to an end. Local governments are in close contact with the people which will
force them to be more accountable. There will be no space for big talk and zero
delivery. Take, for example, the way locals started breathing down the mayor’s
neck when he took steps that would damage the archaeological integrity of Rani
Pokhari, an ancient pond in central Kathmandu. This applies to other local
governments too. Local leaders who fail to perform will be voted out in the
next election.
Unequal distribution
The
federal states were clearly not demarcated on the basis of financial and
natural resources. There are some local governments which are richer in terms
of finance, natural resources, public infrastructure and human resources
than other local governments. Likewise, it is easier to develop
connectivity infrastructure in the plains than in the hills and mountains. This
means that there are some unavoidable constraints for local governments in the
highlands. They will have to be more creative and come up with better ways of
development, something their plains counterparts will not have to confront.
This will give us a clear picture of local governments evolving through this
transition uniquely in the mountains, hills and plains.
It
will be challenging for both local and provincial governments to secure funds
for infrastructure projects that are critical for their growth. The central
government itself will be hard-pressed to disburse money to local and
provincial governments for more than fulfilling basic needs. But the good part
of this system is that it creates an environment of competition among local
governments to attract more resources. Like every Nepali, elected local
government representatives and officials are new to the system. The way is
unfamiliar to everybody. They need resources to build their capabilities and
spend on public infrastructure. Local governments are responsible for
developing and implementing short-, medium- and long-term plans. The challenge
is that not all local governments are capable of developing such plans,
nor do they have the funds to outsource these tasks.
Localised plans are key
There
isn’t one single sample that can be replicated in all the local units. There
should be contextualised and customised plans and projects for each local unit.
No local government will be able to make optimal utilisation of resources and
develop its area without a clear vision and sound plans. The question is who
will come forward to help them at this stage when the central government is
struggling with its own problems. There is also the danger of local governments
trying to get funds and implement some remotely developed projects that have no
connection with the ground realities, and waste limited resources on them. This
is not what we aspired for when we dismantled the unitary system to create
local governments. The purpose is to design and implement plans and projects
that make complete sense to locals. Local governments should focus on priority
areas and the unique features of local lifestyles and
livelihoods.
This
is where development partners, especially the World Bank, Asian Development
Bank and Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank can support local governments
through the Urban Planning Development Centre (UPDC), a planning wing of the
Department of Urban Development and Building Construction under the Ministry of
Urban Development. Meanwhile, the UPDC will also be institutionalised as a wing
to help local and provincial governments develop plans and strategies for urban
development. That can be beneficial for both development partners and the
government since no donor can directly extend financial resources to local
governments.
It
is important to highlight the fact that local governments need technical
assistance to develop a bank of periodic plans and projects before they start
pouring money into any infrastructure project. We have to ensure that all these
761 ‘laboratories’ have the required instruments and knowledge to help them
become successful examples. The efforts and best practices that we will be
developing in all these local units over the years will shape the future of
Nepal as a whole. There is, of course, the challenge of managing financial
resources to institutionalise the federal system that we have just embarked
upon. But that shouldn’t discourage us from supporting local governments to
adopt and implement best practices. We are trying to establish a federal system
under the principles of cooperation and collaboration. This requires all
stakeholders to be equally responsible for both failures and successes.
No comments:
Post a Comment